Remove incomplete zig code from docs. (#1837)

This commit is contained in:
Yudong Jin
2025-12-31 19:47:59 +08:00
committed by GitHub
parent 2778a6f9c7
commit 10f76bd59a
68 changed files with 0 additions and 1343 deletions

View File

@@ -201,21 +201,6 @@ For example, in the following code, the input data size is $n$:
end
```
=== "Zig"
```zig title=""
// On a certain running platform
fn algorithm(n: usize) void {
var a: i32 = 2; // 1 ns
a += 1; // 1 ns
a *= 2; // 10 ns
// Loop n times
for (0..n) |_| { // 1 ns
std.debug.print("{}\n", .{0}); // 5 ns
}
}
```
According to the above method, the algorithm's runtime can be obtained as $(6n + 12)$ ns:
$$
@@ -499,29 +484,6 @@ The concept of "time growth trend" is rather abstract; let us understand it thro
end
```
=== "Zig"
```zig title=""
// Time complexity of algorithm A: constant order
fn algorithm_A(n: usize) void {
_ = n;
std.debug.print("{}\n", .{0});
}
// Time complexity of algorithm B: linear order
fn algorithm_B(n: i32) void {
for (0..n) |_| {
std.debug.print("{}\n", .{0});
}
}
// Time complexity of algorithm C: constant order
fn algorithm_C(n: i32) void {
_ = n;
for (0..1000000) |_| {
std.debug.print("{}\n", .{0});
}
}
```
The figure below shows the time complexity of the above three algorithm functions.
- Algorithm `A` has only $1$ print operation, and the algorithm's runtime does not grow as $n$ increases. We call the time complexity of this algorithm "constant order".
@@ -721,20 +683,6 @@ Given a function with input size $n$:
end
```
=== "Zig"
```zig title=""
fn algorithm(n: usize) void {
var a: i32 = 1; // +1
a += 1; // +1
a *= 2; // +1
// Loop n times
for (0..n) |_| { // +1 (i++ is executed each round)
std.debug.print("{}\n", .{0}); // +1
}
}
```
Let the number of operations of the algorithm be a function of the input data size $n$, denoted as $T(n)$. Then the number of operations of the above function is:
$$
@@ -1012,27 +960,6 @@ Given a function, we can use the above techniques to count the number of operati
end
```
=== "Zig"
```zig title=""
fn algorithm(n: usize) void {
var a: i32 = 1; // +0 (Technique 1)
a = a + @as(i32, @intCast(n)); // +0 (Technique 1)
// +n (Technique 2)
for(0..(5 * n + 1)) |_| {
std.debug.print("{}\n", .{0});
}
// +n*n (Technique 3)
for(0..(2 * n)) |_| {
for(0..(n + 1)) |_| {
std.debug.print("{}\n", .{0});
}
}
}
```
The following formula shows the counting results before and after using the above techniques; both derive a time complexity of $O(n^2)$.
$$