add stubs-vs-mocks/README.md

README.md

@@ -56,8 +56,13 @@ Chinese translations for classic IT resources.
 ------------------
 
 1. [关于`Java`你可能不知道的10件事](10-things-you-didnt-know-about-java/README.md)  
-你是不是写`Java`已经有些年头了？还依稀记得这些吧：
-那些年，它还叫做`Oak`；那些年，`OO`还是个热门话题；那些年，`C++`同学们觉得`Java`是没有出路的；那些年，`Applet`还风头正劲…… 但我打赌下面的这些事中至少有一半你还不知道。
+作者是个`Java`老鸟，行文风趣幽默，娓娓道出`Java`的诡异和难点时不忘着给出用心良苦的提点。
+
+软件测试
+------------------
+
+- [`Stubs`和`Mocks`的区别](stubs-vs-mocks/README.md)  
+翻译自《Programming Groovy》，讲得言简意赅。
 
 `Lisp`
 ------------------

stubs-vs-mocks/README.md

@@ -0,0 +1,54 @@
+翻译自《Programming Groovy － Dynamic Productivity for the jdk Developer》的P243。  
+译文发在：[`Stubs`和`Mocks`的区别](http://oldratlee.com/76/tech/java/stubs-vs-mocks.html)，2010-09-23 / [`Stubs`和`Mocks`的区别](http://blog.csdn.net/oldrat/archive/2010/03/09/5359198.aspx)，2010-03-09。
+
+翻译自《Programming Groovy － Dynamic Productivity for the jdk Developer》的P243，讲得言简意赅，值得翻译出来理解。
+
+`Stubs`和`Mocks`的区别
+======================
+
+在文章[『`Mocks`不是`Stubs`』](http://martinfowler.com/articles/mocksArentStubs.html)，马丁·福勒讨论了`stubs`和`mocks`之间的区别。
+
+`stub`代表的是一个真实的对象。在测试代码中被调用时，它简单地按照之前对它训练的设定来应答调用者。对`stub`应答的设定是为了通过测试。
+
+`mock`对象要比`stub`做的事情多得多：
+
+- 帮你确定你的代码和它的依赖（称为合作者`collaborator`）有你期望的交互。
+- 跟踪你的在`mock`对象代表的合作者执行调用的序列和次数。
+- 保证方法调用传递了合适的参数。
+
+`stubs`只检查的是状态（`state`），而`mocks`检查了行为（`behavior`）。在测试中使用`mock`，不仅检查你测试和其依赖之间和状态，而且还有行为。
+
+> 原文如下：
+> 
+> Stubs vs. Mocks
+> 
+> In the article “Mocks Aren’t Stubs,” (<http://martinfowler.com/articles/mocksArentStubs.html>),
+> Martin Fowler discusses the difference between stubs and mocks. A stub stands in for a real object.
+> It simply reciprocates the coached expected response when called by the code being tested.
+> The response is set up to satisfy the needs for the test to pass.
+> A mock object does a lot more than a stub.
+> It helps you ensure your code is interacting with its dependencies, the collaborators, as expected.
+> It can keep track of the sequence and number of calls your code makes on the collaborator it stands in for.
+> It ensures proper parameters are passed in to method calls.
+> While stubs verify state, mocks verify behavior.
+> When you use a mock in your test, it verifies not only the state but also the behavior of the interaction of your code with its dependencies.
+> Groovy provides support for creating both stubs and mocks, as you will see in Section 16.10, Mocking Using the Groovy Mock Library, on page 254.
+
+PS
+=============
+
+顺便推荐一下[《Programming Groovy 2 － Dynamic Productivity for the jdk Developer》](https://book.douban.com/subject/22170571/)这本书。
+
+这是一本`Groovy`进阶的书，入门可以先看一下[《Groovy Recipes －Greasing the Wheels of jdk》](https://book.douban.com/subject/2584518/)或是[《Groovy Programming －An Introduction for jdk Developers》](https://book.douban.com/subject/1969390/)。`Groovy`的学习资料的介绍可以参见：<http://oldratlee.com/87/groovy-study-info.html>。
+
+《Programming Groovy 2》中有关的**_元编程_**的讲解应该是最全面的。更好的是，对动态语言的编程的最佳实践也讲了很多。
+
+相关资料
+=============
+
+- [Mocks Aren’t Stubs](http://martinfowler.com/articles/mocksArentStubs.html)  
+    [Mock并非Stub（翻译）](http://www.predatorray.me/Mock%E5%B9%B6%E9%9D%9EStub-%E7%BF%BB%E8%AF%91/)
+- 测试相关书籍
+    - [《测试驱动开发》](https://book.douban.com/subject/1230036/)
+    - [《JUnit实战(第2版)》](https://book.douban.com/subject/10561424/)
+    - [《测试驱动的面向对象软件开发》](https://book.douban.com/subject/4910582/)