The issue is that users don't get feedback from MBS about why a
component was not reused. There was added logic which enables to
store log messages in the database and can be viewed through the
REST api of MBS.
Ticket-ID: #1284
Signed-off-by: Martin Curlej <mcurlej@redhat.com>
When recover_orphaned_artifact is called for module-build-macros
and the module-build-macros is not tagged in the -build Koji tag,
then the tag_artifacts() is called to tag it there.
This is correct, but the issue is that module-build-macros need
to be added to "build" and "srpm-build" Koji tag groups, otherwise
it is not installed in the buildroot by default.
A full modulemd is usually a loooon text. This change would be much
easier for reading logs at INFO level only.
Signed-off-by: Chenxiong Qi <cqi@redhat.com>
This will show log like "State transition: init -> wait, ...", which is
much straightforward than showing state number "state 1->2".
Signed-off-by: Chenxiong Qi <cqi@redhat.com>
When resubmitting a module build, if some component is found out that
its attributes have changed, MBS will raise an error to stop the work to
recording components. The problem is original code tells a module build
exists in database already rather than a component build, meanwhile
get_module_name() call on an ComponentRpm object is also incorrect.
Signed-off-by: Chenxiong Qi <cqi@redhat.com>
This patch separates the use of database session in different MBS components
and do not mix them together.
In general, MBS components could be separated as the REST API (implemented
based on Flask) and non-REST API including the backend build workflow
(implemented as a fedmsg consumer on top of fedmsg-hub and running
independently) and library shared by them. As a result, there are two kind of
database session used in MBS, one is created and managed by Flask-SQLAlchemy,
and another one is created from SQLAclhemy Session API directly. The goal of
this patch is to make ensure session object is used properly in the right
place.
All the changes follow these rules:
* REST API related code uses the session object db.session created and
managed by Flask-SQLAlchemy.
* Non-REST API related code uses the session object created with SQLAlchemy
Session API. Function make_db_session does that.
* Shared code does not created a new session object as much as possible.
Instead, it accepts an argument db_session.
The first two rules are applicable to tests as well.
Major changes:
* Switch tests back to run with a file-based SQLite database.
* make_session is renamed to make_db_session and SQLAlchemy connection pool
options are applied for PostgreSQL backend.
* Frontend Flask related code uses db.session
* Shared code by REST API and backend build workflow accepts SQLAlchemy session
object as an argument. For example, resolver class is constructed with a
database session, and some functions accepts an argument for database session.
* Build workflow related code use session object returned from make_db_session
and ensure db.session is not used.
* Only tests for views use db.session, and other tests use db_session fixture
to access database.
* All argument name session, that is for database access, are renamed to
db_session.
* Functions model_tests_init_data, reuse_component_init_data and
reuse_shared_userspace_init_data, which creates fixture data for
tests, are converted into pytest fixtures from original function
called inside setup_method or a test method. The reason of this
conversion is to use fixture ``db_session`` rather than create a
new one. That would also benefit the whole test suite to reduce the
number of SQLAlchemy session objects.
Signed-off-by: Chenxiong Qi <cqi@redhat.com>
This just simplifies the code. It doesn't change the functionality
at all. The tests had to be changed because it assumed that the
xmd.mbs.buildrequires section would be filled out for the input
module which isn't true.
When using default modules, this feature will add conflicts to
module-build-macros for every RPM in a buildrequired base module
that overlaps with RPMs in the buildrequired modules. This will
prevent them from being available in the buildroot, and thus
ensure that the RPMs from the buildrequired modules (non-base
modules) are used even if they have a lower NVR.
This seems to be better behaviour than simply rejecting the module build
completely. MBS still shows warning in the log that it cannot find
any compatible module, but the build continues with the base module
requested in the submitted modulemd.
A base module can set xmd.mbs.default_modules_url, which contains a
URL to a list of modules in the format of name:stream separated by
new lines. When a module buildrequires this base module, the list
of default modules are added as buildrequires of the module automatically
unless there are conflicting streams or the default module is not
in the MBS database.
When NUM_CONCURRENT_BUILDS is 0, then multi-threading is disabled
when submitting builds to Koji. This is not acceptable, so this
commit makes the number of threads configurable.
There was a race condition, when 2 builds where build in the same time.
There was an issue that after one has finished the other reused the new build
for reuse and not the one it started with.
Ticket-ID: FACTORY-3862
Signed-off-by: Martin Curlej <mcurlej@redhat.com>
* Add docstring
* Call dict.setdefault to simplify the code a little which constructs the map
from package name to built RPMs' NVRs.
Signed-off-by: Chenxiong Qi <cqi@redhat.com>
This commit fixes issue with following situation:
Module `foo` has been built with `buildrequires: platform: [f28]`
and `requires: platform: []`. It can therefore be used as a buildrequirement
on any platform stream. But if you want to build module `app` which
buildrequires `foo` on `platform:f30`, the MBS won't pull-in the `foo`
module build, because MBS currently limits the modules by the platform
they have been built for.
This commit adds new config option to allow including modules built
against any platform stream.
To do this, we need to use the same database session in import_mmd as in
ModuleBuild.get_buildrequired_base_modules, otherwise, the returned
ModuleBuild objects are in a detached state.
This fixes module builds which sets the `buildopts` for something else
than the RPM whitelist.
Before this commit, when `buildopts` was set, the RPM whitelist was
always taken from the buildopts even if it was not defined there.
This resulted in empty `rpm_whitelist` and therefore no pkglist set
in Koji tag.
In this commit, MBS uses whitelist from `buildopts` only if it is
really set by the module maintainer.
